Will McLaren Keep Playing Fair and Stop Verstappen? - Formula 1 Q&A
The Red Bull team's driver Max Verstappen closed the gap in the drivers' championship by winning both the sprint and feature races at the Austin Grand Prix.
McLaren's Lando Norris placed second on race day to narrow Oscar Piastri's championship lead to 14 points with five races remaining.
Four-times world champion Verstappen is now only 40 points trailing Piastri approaching this weekend's Mexican Grand Prix.
Must McLaren Accept Reality of F1 - That if You Want Win, It's Not Always Possible to Play Fair?
McLaren are well aware of the obstacle they confront with Max Verstappen and Red Bull in the championship battle this year, but they see no reason to modify their method to running the team.
They will persist to give both drivers the optimal opportunity they can and run the team on a basis of equity and equanimity.
"This is the manner we intend racing. This is the way in which we tackle competition, and we want to remain equitable, and we want to apply equality to our drivers."
Team principal Stella is a veteran of many title battles. He won the championship as engineer to Kimi Raikkonen in 2007 when the Ferrari racer recovered 17 points under the previous points system in two races to win the championship, while the McLaren team imploded.
And he lost the championship as engineer to Fernando Alonso in 2010, when the Ferrari team messed up their strategy at the last Grand Prix of the championship and allowed Vettel and Red Bull to snatch the title from under their noses.
Andrea Stella commented following the Grand Prix in Austin: "We look at the next five races as chances to extend the lead on Max. And when it comes to having to make a decision as to a driver, this will exclusively be determined by mathematics."
"We rely on the past experience. I can remember at least 2007, 2010, in which you go to the final Grand Prix and it's in fact the third-placed driver that claims the title. So we're not going to make decisions unless this is determined by mathematics."
What Prompted McLaren to Cease Upgrades on The Current Car?
Every team this year have had to face the dilemma of how long to focus on their 2025 season car while also ensuring they are as ready as they can be for the significant rules overhaul scheduled for the 2026 season.
In F1, it's usually the situation that if a constructor makes mistakes at the beginning of a new rules cycle, it can take a long time to catch up. And if they get it right, that benefit can last for a while - look at Red Bull in 2022 and 2023, the most recent occasion the regulations changed.
McLaren began this season with the best car, after investing a lot of innovation into their 2025 season design.
They did continue to develop it for a while, but were experiencing reduced benefits. So when evaluating the bang for buck they were achieving on their 2025 car compared to the 2026 car, it became an easy choice to switch focus to the following season.
The Red Bull team have closed the gap since introducing their new underfloor and nose section at the Monza Grand Prix, but the McLaren car stays competitive - team principal Stella stated he believed Norris had the speed to challenge for the win in Texas had he not finished behind Charles Leclerc.
"We just have to keep optimising the performance and keep delivering good race weekends. And from this point of view, if you consider a Grand Prix like Baku, we failed to optimize the car's potential and we didn't deliver a perfect race."
"Therefore we have a large chance, and the result of this championship and the drivers' championship is in our hands. It's not in someone else's hands."
Driver Transfers: How Difficult Is It to Switch Teams?
First of all, it's uncertain the question has an completely accurate basis. It's true that each of Hamilton and Carlos Sainz had slightly sticky opening phases of the season, in varying manners, and that they are now performing much better.
Carlos Sainz and Albon currently look very even. However, it's less certain that, in Hamilton's case, he is yet the "match" of Charles Leclerc - or not consistently, at least.
Hamilton has not beaten Charles Leclerc frequently at all this year, either in qualifying or Grand Prix.
He is now much closer than he previously. He is consistently setting times within a small fraction of a second of Leclerc, but in qualifying battles it's four-two to Charles Leclerc since the mid-season break.
This last weekend in Austin, on one of Lewis Hamilton's preferred tracks, he was a full second behind his teammate when the Monegasque made his pit stop, and dropped thirteen seconds over the rest of the Grand Prix.
Looking back, Leclerc was on the best race strategy. Nevertheless, over the championship, and even now, it's difficult to claim that on balance Leclerc has hasn't been the better Ferrari driver this season.
Both Lewis Hamilton and Sainz have talked about how difficult it is to change constructors, and we have to take them at their word.
Lewis Hamilton would not say even currently that he was completely adjusted to Ferrari - and he is hoping the regulation changes next season will benefit his driving style; he has never really enjoyed these venturi cars.
There is a great deal for a racing driver to get their head around when they change constructors, as Hamilton has described repeatedly this season. But not all struggle in this manner.
Fernando Alonso, for example, was performing well from the start of the 2023 season when he moved to the Aston Martin team. And would Max Verstappen struggle if he changed constructors? I believe most in Formula 1 would expect not.
How Soon Can We Determine The Coming Season's Competitive Order?
Until the cars are driven for the first time in winter testing next year, no-one will know how the constructors are performing next year.
The first test, in Catalunya on 26-30 January, is private because the teams wanted to get their heads around their initial track time of the power unit changes without the scrutiny of the media.
So the pair of sessions in Sakhir on February 11-13 and 18-20 February will be the first time some kind of sense of relative performance becomes apparent.
But, as always, it's only at the first race that the true and accurate situation will become clear.